Skip to content

Palomar Transients

Two new papers claim brief transients in 1950s Palomar plates correlate with nuclear tests and UFO reports

Palomar Transients

1950s “vanishing lights” tied to nukes and UFO reports. Artifact or anomaly?

Quick Take: Two new peer-reviewed papers reanalyze 1950s Palomar sky plates and report statistical links between brief “transient” lights, above-ground nuclear tests, and spikes in historical UFO reports. Critics say the signals can still be plate flaws or other mundane effects. Current read: medium curiosity value, weak extraordinary claim until independent plate forensics land. Live Science


A 70-year-old mystery just resurfaced in mainstream science coverage.
Researchers combed through thousands of vintage Palomar Observatory images and found star-like flashes that appear on one plate, then vanish.
They now argue those “transients” cluster around dates of Cold War nuclear tests and rise with same-day UFO report counts, a pattern reviving the idea of pre-Sputnik artificial objects in orbit. Others urge caution.

“Intriguing statistics from rough data is not the same thing as a clean detection.”

What is being claimed

Authors report that brief, point-like transients in 1949–1957 sky plates are more likely within a day of above-ground nuclear tests, and that nights with more UFO reports also show more transients. A companion analysis says some events appear in aligned groups and are rarer inside Earth’s umbral shadow, hinting at sunlight glints from reflective objects in high orbit.


What we actually know so far


Red flags and green flags

Red flags

Green flags


How this looks right now: medium curiosity, weak extraordinary signal.

The stats are interesting and the umbra prediction is at least falsifiable, which is better than vibes. But the foundational question remains whether we are measuring real sky events or plate and digitization quirks. Until independent teams examine original plates under a microscope, or reproduce the same patterns in other pre-Sputnik archives with tight controls, this sits in the “keep watching, don’t overclaim” bucket. Live Science


Closing

What would move the needle: forensic checks of the original Palomar plates, replication on other observatory archives, and a pre-registered analysis plan that survives alternate nulls. Stay curious, stay skeptical, and let the next receipts lead.


The receipts

More in Signal Check

See all
Disclosure Day

Disclosure Day

/

More from The Archivist

See all