Skip to content

Project Preserve Destiny

Did the NSA train “intuitive communicators” to talk to non-human intelligences?

Project Preserve Destiny

Quick Take
A former USAF tech sergeant named Dan Sherman says he worked with or at the NSA on Project Preserve Destiny (PPD), a Cold War era effort to train “intuitive communicators” for alien contact. The claim is back in the feed because Jesse Michels just interviewed Sherman on American Alchemy. There are books, interviews, FOIA breadcrumbs, and broader precedent for government psi research. There is not a declassified document that verifies PPD as described. Treat as a compelling claim that still sits in the unverified zone. YouTube+1


The spark: Michels’ new interview

Jesse Michels released a long interview with Dan Sherman titled “The NSA Hired Me To Speak To Aliens.” Sherman describes PPD as an NSA program that trained personnel to receive and relay messages from non-human intelligences. That episode is now circulating across YouTube and podcast platforms, which explains the sudden surge in attention. YouTube+2Apple Podcasts+2

The core claim

Sherman first laid out his story in 1997 in Above Black: Project Preserve Destiny, describing himself as a USAF member assigned to NSA work as an ELINT specialist who was later tasked as an “intuitive communicator” for alien contact. The book outlines training, classified work sites, and messages he says he received, along with references to a long-term plan involving human-alien interaction. Goodreads+2Amazon+2

What the public record does and does not show

What exists publicly

What is missing

Why the claim persists

The story aligns with a familiar pattern in UFO history: secret program, special selection and training, extraordinary communications, limited paper evidence, and a single primary witness. It is also boosted by real precedent for classified psi research and by periodic waves of UAP interest, hearings, and FOIA attention. A recent compiled testimony packet even summarizes PPD claims while citing Sherman’s book, again reflecting interest rather than official confirmation. House Oversight Committee


Alleged program details at a glance (as told by Sherman)


Credibility meter

Witnesses: 3 of 5

Documentation: 2 of 5

Expert review: 2.5 of 5

Overall: 2.7 of 5


What would prove it

  1. A declassified PPD directive, funding line, or training syllabus.
  2. Independent participants who can be verified by service records and who provide consistent testimony.
  3. Cross-reference in FOIAable logs, taskers, or contract vehicles that survive redaction.

What if PPD were real


How to investigate next


Sources

More in Signal Check

See all
Disclosure Day

Disclosure Day

/

More from The Archivist

See all