UFO/UAPS

Case File — USS Nimitz “Tic Tac” (2004)

The Archivist

The Archivist

— 3 min read
Case File — USS Nimitz “Tic Tac” (2004)

Overview

In November 2004, pilots from the USS Nimitz Carrier Strike Group intercepted a white, wingless object over the Pacific that moved in ways they could not explain. A second flight recorded the now-famous FLIR video. Years later, the Department of Defense officially released that footage and the Navy confirmed it as authentic UAP material. CBS NewsU.S. Department of DefenseNaval Air Systems Command

Timeline

  • Nov 10–14, 2004: USS Princeton’s radar repeatedly tracks unknown targets off Southern California and vectors aircrews from the Nimitz to intercept. HISTORY
  • Nov 14, 2004: Cmdr. David Fravor and Lt. Cmdr. Alex Dietrich visually observe a white, oblong “Tic Tac” above an ocean disturbance. They report rapid maneuvers and no visible control surfaces. CBS News
  • Later that day: A second sortie including WSO Lt. Cmdr. Chad Underwood records the FLIR1 video, the clip most people associate with the Nimitz event. Underwood later says he coined the “Tic Tac” nickname. New York Magazine
  • Apr 27, 2020: DoD publishes the FLIR, GIMBAL, and GOFAST videos; Navy’s FOIA library hosts the files. U.S. Department of DefenseNaval Air Systems Command
  • Jun 25, 2021: ODNI’s preliminary UAP assessment cites data limitations and pilot safety concerns. Director of National Intelligence

Primary sources

Claims and counterclaims

Claim: Multiple sensors and pilots observed an object with extreme acceleration and no obvious propulsion.
Counterpoints: Analysts propose prosaic explanations like distant aircraft, parallax, gimbal and glare artifacts, and tracking-mode jumps that create the illusion of abrupt motion. The AARO and independent researchers have presented such analyses for other Navy videos, and skeptics argue similar effects could explain parts of FLIR1. AAROMetabunk

Claim: The DoD release means the object is exotic.
Counterpoint: DoD’s publication and Navy confirmation authenticate the videos without identifying the object’s origin. Official language frames them as UAP and emphasizes pilot safety, not extraterrestrial conclusions. U.S. Department of DefenseTIME

Credibility meter

Score each 1 to 5.

  • Witnesses: 4
    Multiple trained observers plus radar operators describe consistent behavior. CBS NewsHISTORY
  • Physical evidence: 2
    No recovered materials. Main data are video and radar operator accounts.
  • Documentation: 4
    Official videos and an ODNI report exist, though raw sensor data are limited. Naval Air Systems CommandDirector of National Intelligence
  • Expert review: 2–3
    Competing analyses exist and no consensus explanation is accepted. AARO

Overall: ~3.2 (mixed but noteworthy)

Red flags

  • FLIR1 lacks range and altitude context. Camera mode changes can mimic abrupt motion. Metabunk
  • Public documentation is partial. Some data and telemetry remain classified or unavailable, which restricts definitive conclusions. Director of National Intelligence

What we know

Unknowns

  • The object’s identity, range, and performance characteristics remain unconfirmed with public data. Director of National Intelligence
  • Whether multiple radar and visual reports in the period all refer to the same phenomenon. HISTORY
💡
What If…? Some researchers speculate the Tic Tac wasn’t just a craft but evidence of a breakthrough propulsion system ... potentially exploiting space-time warping or manipulating gravity fields. Others take it further, suggesting it was a probe from a non-human intelligence conducting surveillance over naval assets, deliberately revealing itself to test human response. A wilder theory is that it was an experimental U.S. black project “leaked” into open skies, with the intent of gauging how pilots would describe it. None of these theories have been proven, but they illustrate why this short FLIR clip has become one of the most hotly debated mysteries in aerospace history.

Where to dig next

  • Compare the FLIR track to sensor geometry and wind to test parallax or target-aircraft hypotheses. Metabunk
  • Seek corroborating deck logs, SPY-1 radar snapshots, and aircrew tapes via FOIA to anchor the timeline. Naval Air Systems Command
  • Cross-check the Fravor–Dietrich visual with Underwood’s FLIR to assess whether they captured the same object or separate events. New York Magazine

Receipts

💡
Bottom Line- Authentic Navy video plus trained witnesses make the Nimitz case stand out, but the public record still lacks the raw sensor context needed to lock down what the object was.

Read more