The Indrid Cold Encounter (1966, West Virginia)

Overview

On November 2, 1966, traveling salesman Woodrow Derenberger reported a close encounter on Route 77 near Parkersburg, West Virginia. He said a dark craft forced him to stop, and a smiling man in a shiny suit approached, communicating telepathically and identifying himself as “Cold.” Over the following weeks Derenberger gave radio and TV interviews, filed statements, and later wrote a book expanding the story. The Indrid Cold motif has since woven into the broader Point Pleasant lore alongside the Mothman reports.

Timeline

• Evening, Nov 2, 1966 — Derenberger drives home from a sales trip. He says an object resembling a charcoal-colored craft swoops in front of his truck and hovers.
• Roadside exchange — A tall, neatly dressed man steps out, smiles constantly, and “speaks” without moving his lips. He gives the name “Cold,” asks about the town, and departs back to the craft.
• Nov 3–4 — Derenberger reports to local police and media. A live radio interview and a local TV appearance circulate quickly.
• Mid Nov 1966 to early 1967 — Derenberger describes follow-up contacts and longer communications, sometimes using the name “Indrid Cold.”
• 1971 — Derenberger self-publishes Visitors From Lanulos, a narrative of extended contact including travel to another world.
• Aftermath — The account becomes a pillar of Point Pleasant folklore and is referenced in later books and documentaries.

Primary sources you can embed or cite

• 1966 TV interview clip with Derenberger describing the first encounter
• 1966 radio call-in audio where he answers listener questions
• Police statement summary notes reprinted in regional papers
• Derenberger’s book Visitors From Lanulos (1971)
• Later folklore works that catalog the Point Pleasant wave

Claims and counterclaims

Claim: A human-like entity communicated telepathically, gave a name, and arrived and departed with a hovering craft.
Counter: Normal explanations include misperception under stress at night, a vehicle stop by an ordinary person, or an outright hoax that grew as media attention increased. Telepathy and perfect “smile” are subjective features and difficult to test.

Claim: Multiple people near the same corridor reported unusual lights around the same period which supports Derenberger’s account.
Counter: The Point Pleasant wave produced many unrelated reports. Temporal clustering alone cannot validate any single narrative.

Claim: Later “Indrid Cold” appearances in regional stories show an ongoing presence.
Counter: Once a name enters local lore, copycat reports and retrospective embellishments often follow.

Credibility meter (1–5)

• Witnesses: 2
  Primarily one witness for the close encounter. Secondary attention came from media interviews after the fact.
• Physical evidence: 1
  No verified photographs, trace samples, or instrumented data.
• Documentation: 4
  Multiple on-record interviews and contemporary press, plus a book by the witness.
• Expert review: 2
  Folklore and paranormal literature discuss it widely; limited formal investigation standards were applied.

Overall: ~2.25 (rich documentation of testimony, weak empirical support)

Red flags

• The narrative expanded over time, a common pattern when a story becomes a local sensation.
• Telepathy, perfect smiling affect, and extended off-world travel claims move the case from CE-III into contactee literature where verification is hardest.
• No preserved site survey with measurements or chain-of-custody evidence.

What we know

• Derenberger put his name and face on detailed interviews within days of the claimed event.
• The Indrid Cold motif became part of the wider Point Pleasant wave and persists in modern retellings.

Unknowns

• Whether any independent driver on Route 77 that night recorded a matching stop or unusual traffic event
• Exact make and description of the “craft” under standard photometry or radar
• Whether police or media archived full, unedited interview reels and call logs that could clarify early details

What If…?

If literal: The entity matches a human-seeming emissary model that prioritizes calm affect and low threat. Telepathic exchange could reflect some form of direct neural stimulation or suggestive communication.

If misread or staged: A highway pull-over by a costumed prankster or an unusual truck or aircraft sighting misinterpreted at night could seed the core image. Memory consolidation plus community attention then amplify the mythos.

If folkloric hybrid: A kernel event plus social reinforcement and media interviews rapidly crystallized a regional archetype, explaining the durable “smiling man” pattern across later stories.

Where to dig next

• Archive hunt: Pull full-length 1966 TV station tapes and radio station reels. Transcribe verbatim.
• Route reconstruction: Recreate night lighting, traffic speeds, and stopping distances on the same highway segment to test visibility and witness timing claims.
• Comparative folklore: Map pre-1966 “smiling stranger” or telepathic visitor motifs in Appalachia to separate preexisting legend from post-event spread.
• Document scan: Collect police dispatch logs and press clippings from Nov–Dec 1966 to lock the earliest wording and reduce later drift.